Carbonate Pore-Type Screener

Identify dominant carbonate pore type from well log signatures using Lucia and Anselmetti-Eberli approaches. Classifies pore systems as interparticle, moldic, vuggy, or fractured based on velocity-porosity relationships. Provides permeability estimates and Lucia pore class assignment.

Petrophysics Carbonates Pore Type Lucia Classification

Input Parameters

Well Log Inputs

μs/ft
Compressional sonic log
fraction
From density or neutron log
g/cc
For density-neutron separation check
v/v
For vuggy porosity detection

Additional Indicators

From image logs or sonic quality
Primary mineralogy

Quick Presets

Results

Theory & References

Carbonate Pore Types

Carbonate pore systems exhibit distinct velocity-porosity relationships based on pore geometry:

  • Interparticle: Pores between grains, follows Wyllie time average, best permeability
  • Moldic: Dissolved grains leaving molds, intermediate velocity-porosity
  • Vuggy (separate): Isolated vugs, high velocity for porosity, poor permeability
  • Vuggy (touching): Connected vugs, intermediate properties
  • Fractured: Very high velocity, cycle skipping, excellent permeability

Lucia Classification

Lucia's petrophysical classification divides carbonates into three classes based on pore size:

  • Class 1: Large (>20 μm) interparticle or intercrystalline pores. Highest permeability for given porosity.
  • Class 2: Small (<20 μm) interparticle pores or separate-vug porosity. Moderate permeability.
  • Class 3: Microporosity (<2 μm) in mud-dominated fabrics. Lowest permeability.

Each class has distinct porosity-permeability relationships

Velocity-Porosity Transform

The acoustic response discriminates pore types:

Vp = √(K/ρ)

Where K is bulk modulus, ρ is bulk density

  • Interparticle: Follows Wyllie time average: 1/Vp = φ/Vfluid + (1-φ)/Vmatrix
  • Vuggy: Higher Vp (lower ΔT) than expected - vugs don't reduce stiffness proportionally
  • Moldic: Between interparticle and vuggy trends
  • Fractured: Even lower ΔT, often with cycle skipping

Acoustic Formation Index (AFI)

Quantifies deviation from time-average relationship:

AFI = (ΔTma - ΔT) / (ΔTma - ΔTf)

Where ΔTma = matrix transit time, ΔTf = fluid transit time

  • AFI > 0.8: Interparticle porosity (follows time average closely)
  • 0.5 < AFI < 0.8: Moldic or touching-vug porosity
  • AFI < 0.5: Separate-vug or fractured (high velocity)

Density-Neutron Separation

Helps identify vuggy porosity:

  • Large separation: Density porosity >> neutron porosity indicates separate vugs
  • Close agreement: Interparticle or well-connected porosity
  • Mechanism: Neutron sees hydrogen in pore fluid, density sees bulk void space
  • Vugs: Density detects void, neutron may miss if water-filled vugs are large

Anselmetti & Eberli Approach

Velocity-porosity-mineralogy relationships in carbonates:

  • Demonstrates systematic velocity variations with pore type at constant porosity
  • Separate trends for grain-dominated vs mud-dominated fabrics
  • Links acoustic properties to depositional texture and diagenesis
  • Provides framework for seismic reservoir characterization

Permeability Estimation

Lucia permeability-porosity transforms by class:

log(k) = a·φ + b

Where constants vary by pore class:

  • Class 1: k ≈ 45 × 1015φ (best permeability)
  • Class 2: k ≈ 2 × 1015φ (moderate)
  • Class 3: k ≈ 0.1 × 1015φ (poorest)
  • Fractured: Permeability dominated by fracture network, often 100-1000× higher

Development Implications

  • Interparticle: Predictable porosity-permeability, good sweep, waterflood candidate
  • Moldic: Moderate heterogeneity, fair sweep efficiency
  • Separate-vug: Poor connectivity, low recovery factor, may need fracturing
  • Touching-vug: Complex flow paths, dual-porosity behavior
  • Fractured: Excellent productivity, high heterogeneity, early water breakthrough risk

Application Guidelines

  • Combine indicators: Use velocity, density-neutron, and image logs together
  • Calibrate locally: Core-calibrate transforms for your field
  • Watch for: Mixed pore types in single interval
  • Validate: Compare with core thin sections and permeability data
  • Consider: Diagenetic history affects velocity-porosity relationships